with ref to the entry on 22/3, MAN can i whinge. LOLZ! 看到自己写的东西都忍不住要笑了... reading
chuck klosterman's 'this is emo' essay (which in tribute i shall probably type out and place as an entry here) has given me an insight into my ideas and concepts i have towards romance/intimacy. and i think it is mostly SPOT-ON. he manages to articulate the mindset with which i view romantic r/ships. which can actually be a sense of relief or totally scary, depending on how u look at it. in a sense, it could be said tat this complete and total enthusiasm i have for the mass media and the entertainment industry has ruined my life (or more like, my love life, cuz i more or less like the other parts of my life, thx very much), since i am essentially using it as a baseline from which i construct my (generally hypothetical) romances.
and if u bring tat to a deeper level, since we're in the era of information overload, where everything is basically mtv'ised, from love, violence, family, friendship, work, play, spirituality, basically the entire fucking way one leads one's life -- then how do i noe tat wat i think is
wat i think?
i guess it's pretty much impossible to think tat ur thots belong solely to urself, and the pinnacle of egocentrism is to really believe tat u came up with some idea all by urself, as meryl streep so eloquently points out in her put-down of anne hathaway's fuddy-duddy sweater in
the devil wears prada. however remote and unconnected it may seem, there's a link there - the flap of a butterfly's wings and all tat jazz.
yet it could still be tat one absorbs these ideas floating out there in the ether, and assimilates or recombines it into one's own, so altho it's a mish-mash of old ideas, yet it's something supposedly new?... ... ... it's all becoming confusingly circular, and i've managed to puzzle myself into blur-ness.